DISCLAIMER: These notes are from the defunct k8 project which precedes SquirrelJME. The notes for SquirrelJME start on 2016/02/26! The k8 project was effectively a Java SE 8 operating system and as such all of the notes are in the context of that scope. That project is no longer my goal as SquirrelJME is the spiritual successor to it.


For AnnotatedEnumRover, I just need a map between the field and the enum entry so I may use AnnotatedElementGroup.


Had an idea for the testing framework, use a bunch of public static methods starting with "test$" that take a parameter that is some kind of test system feedback thing. It would have to be done so that all test may be run concurrent of each other and in any order (so it gets done faster).


Thinking about reflective issues since the enum members will be part of a private class in an inner class which might not be accessed from the outside using normal means. The VM probably would ignore it but I would want my VM to maintain the same limitation checks with reflection as with compilation. The thing is that I would have AnnotatedElementGroup and AnnotatedEnumRover (which would use the former class) be very similar to each other. So I may just be overcomplicating things, because I just create a AnnotatedElementGroup with the enum values, and the argument parser would just use those as normal. However, for enumerations the class does not have the annotations, the field of the holding class does, and that is what needs to be handled. So I have a rather reflecty problem since the common library is in its own package and the enum for option values would be a private enum in the class. I will have to think of the solution to this.


Using reflection makes things easy, but complicates things.


Actually, all I need is a list of enumeration values, I can then use getEnclosingClass(), provided that works for enumerations. Of which it does not, because it returns the class the enumeration itself resides in. So in such a case, I instead need to getClass() then perhaps the super class of that. Since you cannot get an object of the super-enum anyway. However, getSuperClass() returns Enum, while getClass() returns the anonymous class. getDeclaringClass() does the same. Actually, Enum has getDeclaringClass() which does what I need, so I must not use the class of getClass().


Forgot what I was thinking about how to proceed, thinking about food.


I remember, have a class for enumerations of which I can just slap together a bunch of arrays. However instead of EnumRover I will make an EnumGroup which just wraps AnnotatedElementGroup with Enum handling. I should just write something rather than think about it too much.


Did some work, had this idea to use "export LC_ALL=C" in my build scripts since that is probably faster, and I intend C locale anyway. Things may run a bit faster possible. I wonder.


No speed increase at all.


Figured it out (but I should eat first), I can just have AElG be a simple iterable for its own entries and such.